think about treating yourself to a robotic lawn lawn mower ? If cut your grass every week or so is n’t a task that you in particular love , then a robot lawn lawn mower would be a worthwhile purchase . However , with so many different option now available on the market , deciding which model would be safe for your lawn can be a little tricky .
Do a search online for the dependable machinelike lawn mower for lowly gardens and two of the most popular options will be theFlymo EasiLife 150 GOvsWORX Landroid S WR130E. I recently tested out both of these car and while there are several similarity between them , there are also some major deviation that are likely to sway your buying decision .
Setting The Lawn Mowers Up
Winner – Worx Landroid
The setup process for a machinelike lawn lawn mower is generally quite standard ; secure the base to the ground and then lie the boundary conducting wire . However , there are two panorama to this where the Flymo and Landroid differ .
The first is in lay the radix . TheFlymo reverses into its docking facility , meaning that you’re able to place the base anywhere , including in a corner . However , theLandroid is a side - charging machine . It drives into its dock from one side and then exits from the other , so the infrastructure needs a bonny chip of room on either side .
Just like any robot lawn mower , both machines rely on a boundary telegram . However , theFlymo also command an additional guide wire . This require to lead from the al-Qa’ida to the farthermost point of your boundary cable . You ’ll also need to lay a guide wire down the center of any narrow passageways that you require your lawn lawn mower to manoeuvre through . Although this is n’t a huge amount of extra work , it does mean that the Landroid is the undecomposed option if you ’re desire for a frame-up process that ’s as bare as potential .
Design
At first glance , both the Flymo and the Landroid look fairly similar . They ’re bothroughly the same contour and size , and they also both have a vivid orange organic structure . Both machines extend thesame cut height variationstoo – 20 - 50 mm , although it ’s mucheasier to change the cut peak on the Landroid .
Where they get down to differ is when it comes tocutting width . The Flymo ’s is 16 atomic number 96 while the Landroid ’s is 18 centimeter . It ’s not a Brobdingnagian difference but it does mean that the Landroid is capable of take off a little bit more of your grass with each pass . That tell , this crap sense look at that theLandroid is designed for slightly large garden – it can maintain an surface area of up to 300 m² , whereas the Flymo ’s limit is 150 m² .
Another notable difference between the two is thatthe Landroid has an LED screen door , whereas the Flymo does n’t . This obviously has no effect on the functioning of the machines , but the Landroid is a petty easier to operate because of it .
Power
You ’ll needmains electricity for boththe Flymo and the Landroid – this connects up to each machine ’s base and blame the lawn lawn mower ’s battery each fourth dimension it docks .
TheFlymo ’s battery is built into the unit . This is n’t an issue as such , although it does make it a little tricky to replace , which you ’ll credibly need to do after using the lawn mower for a few class .
On the other hand , theLandroid uses an standardised WORX PowerShare barrage fire . If you own a barrage - power WORX tool , then you ’ll already have one of these batteries . If not , they ’re wanton to bribe , give way you the option of promote your lawn mower ’s shelling . The main welfare to this would be that your Landroid would be able-bodied to ply for a longer period of metre in between flush , mean that it would get your lawn under control even quicker . It would also be open of cutting an domain that ’s even big than 300 m² , so long as you buy some extra boundary wire too . Unfortunately , the Flymo ’s built - in bombardment does n’t offer this flexibility and versatility .
Performance
There is n’t a immense difference between how the Flymo and the Landroid perform .
The Landroid does seem to work a picayune more expeditiously in that it call for slightly less meter on the lawn to keep it maintained , but when it comes down to it , they both bring home the bacon a neat and even finish .
Theyboth also mulch as they cutand are able to handleslopes and rough ground . That allege , theLandroid can undertake unconscionable inclinesthan the Flymo – up to 35 % vs Flymo ’s 25 % .
They both apportion the same downside too – they struggle with the border of a lawn that backs onto a raised edge . If your lawn has plane edges , this is n’t a trouble , but it ’ll mean that you ’ll need to strim the edges of your lawn if they ’re bordered by a paries , a raised bed , or anything else that the simple machine would look at as an obstacle .
translate NEXT
Features
If canonical feature are all you ’re search for , then the Flymo and the Landroid are somewhat exchangeable .
Both havetemperature sensorsthat keep the automobile docked in nipping conditions so as not to damage the sens or the simple machine . The Landroid has an additional rainfall detector too , whereas theFlymo will continue to cut the grass in the pelting . This is n’t a forged thing – the simple machine is light so it leaves no tracks on the lawn , and it has n’t yet clogged with crocked grass .
They both also have anaccompanying appwith a programing lineament , plus a few other customisable option .
If you ’re looking for a few advanced lineament on top of that , then that ’s where the Landroid shines .
Its AIA Patented Navigation Technology is the reason why the machine does n’t require a guide telegram , and it also imply that you’re able to utilise the app to set invisible fences around certain areas of your lawn . If you wanted the Flymo to circulate around an area , you would need to lay down an additional boundary telegram .
There are also a few extra modules , such as an Anti - Collision System , that you may buy one by one for the Landroid , which is an option that the Flymo does n’t offer .
READ NEXT : The UK ’s Best Robot Lawn Mower
Safety
achiever – attraction
Both the Flymo and the Landroid come up with all of the guard features that a automaton lawn mower may ask .
They both boasttilt and lift sensorsthat block the vane if the machine is lifted . They also both travel at a very slow pace . When they bump into something , it ’s gentle and wo n’t cause any damage .
Both simple machine are also fit with a fall number and give you the option of adding a ignition lock and an alarm via the app if you desire to protect it further .
Value for Money
One big difference between the Flymo and the Landroid is the price , with theLandroid being more expensive . While that may be the case , I would have to say thatboth machines offer up good time value for money .
The Flymo may cost a picayune less , but this is because it ’s designed for a modest lawn and it also has few characteristic . However , if a basic robot for a small lawn is all that you ’re after , then it ’s a great deal !
On the other hand , if you involve to maintain a more or less magnanimous lawn and the excess feature would be useful to you , then the Landroid would definitely be a worthwhile leverage .
Overall
If your lawn is larger than 150 m² , then the Landroid would be your best wager . However , if your garden is roughly that size or little , then the main difference between the Flymo EasiLife 150 GO vs WORX Landroid S WR130E is the features . TheLandroid is more innovative , whereas the Flymo is slimly more basic .
With that being said , the most of import thing to estimate a robot lawn lawn mower on is its execution . In that area , both automobile did an awful job and have left my grass looking much intelligent . So , rest assured that no matter which one you pick , you ’ll definitely end up with a beautifully manicured lawn !
READ NEXT : How Does a Robot Lawn Mower Work ?
How useful was this post ?
press a star to rate it !
As you found this post useful …
